DeSales University Admissions SAT Scores, Admit Rate

Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night. - 1002 Words

Death has been one of the most common topics for poetry throughout literary history. Dylan Thomas, an early twentieth century poet, also tackled this difficult idea with his poem, Do not go gentle into that good night. By utilizing contrast and comparisions, this villanelle serves as an exploration and attempted explanation both for the reader and Thomas. Do not go gentle into that good night is arranged in the villanelle format; consisting of nineteen lines that form five tercets and a quatrain, the first and third lines of the first tercet are alternately repeated as a refrain closing the succeeding stanzas and meet as the final couplet in the quatrain. (Villanelle 1) Thomas chose to discuss a new view on dying with each†¦show more content†¦Thomas also makes use of devices such as metonomy. The use of darkness clearly represents death, a pervading theme of the poem. Words, used in line four, represent the whole ideas of wise men, while the tears blessing Thomas in the se venteenth line symbolize the act and acceptance of death. Allusion is also found in this and the previous lines, where father and curse, bless refer to both Thomas father and the final blessings given by priests (Do notÂ… 52). Apostrophe (addressing father) and alliteration (go/gentle/good) are present, as well. Do not go gentle into that good night may initially seem like a straightforward ode to life and death, a warning on enjoying the light while still alive. Thomas shifts this meaning with the quatrain, revealing a deep need to connect with both his father and the true meaning of his own life. By comparing the types of men on their deathbeds, Thomas attempts to separate himself from his eventual morose moment of reflection. Feeling he will regret the paths he chose in life and end like his father (sad, blind, tearful), Thomas creates a warning both to his father and himself to face mortality with the same vigor as life. Works Cited Galens, David, Ed. Dylan Thomas 1914-1953. Poetry Criticism. Vol. 52. Farmington Hills, MI: The Gale Group, 2004. 207-338. Napierkowski, Marie and Mary K. Ruby, Ed. Do not go gentle into that good night. Poetry For Students. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale Research, 1998.Show MoreRelatedDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night1069 Words   |  5 Pages In â€Å"Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night,† poet Dylan Thomas uses nighttime as a metaphor for death, and anguishes over his father’s willing acceptance of it. He urges his father to â€Å"Rage, rage against the dying of the light,† i.e. the onset of night, or as it is used here, death. This poem is one of the most famous villanelles every written in the English language. A villanelles is 19 lines long, consisting of five stanzas of three lines each and concluding with a four line stanza. A villanellesRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night1140 Words   |  5 Pagespoem, Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night. This well-known poem discusses death, and the speaker’s belief that one should fight against â€Å"the dying of the light† (Meyer, 247). He ends the poem by addressing his father, and urges him â€Å"Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.† (Meyer, 248). The Poem itself is structured into six stanzas, each consisting of three lines, accept the last which consists of 4 lines. The opening stanza begins with the line, â€Å"Do notRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night1115 Words   |  5 PagesDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night Finn Andersson Dylan Thomas Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night by Dylan Thomas explores death and how those facing it should fight for their lives because death is a heartbreaking subject to him. The writer is addressing his father and pleads him to resist the power of death as it would be devastating if the father was to die from the writers perspective. Throughout the poem, Thomas writes about different traits of men. Some aspects include wiseRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night1555 Words   |  7 PagesThomas wrote â€Å"Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night† as a counter argument against the prevailing attitude most have towards death because he felt it was important to not be resigned and docile to death. He defies conventional norms within the poem to illustrate that nothing should be accepted at face value, that even events such as death should be met with resistance. This can be seen in Thomas deliberate misuse of words. For instance, he could have used gently instead of gentle in the title, butRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night964 Words   |  4 PagesIn â€Å"Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night,† Dylan Thomas amplifies the human spirit by the usage symbolism and metaphors to reveal internal struggles that we may face in life, as well as the loss of a loved one, something that we all can relate to. While trying to encourage his father to fight for his last moments in life, the poet uses the â€Å"night† as a symbol for death. Another symbol that is used is the word â€Å"gentle† and â€Å"Old,† these words give meaning that the old should not go so easily intoRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night890 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"The fight that is life† is the common theme represented in all three of the following poems, â€Å"Do not go gentle into that good night† by Dylan Thomas, â€Å"I know why the caged bird sings† by Maya Angelou and â€Å"Invictus† by William Ernest Henley. This essay will analyze these three poems in detail to find similarities and differences between them. The three aforementioned poems seem to have more differences than similarities between them. Such as in â€Å"I know why the caged bird sings,† which is aboutRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night866 Words   |  4 PagesUpon first reading, one can easily tell that there are several differences and similarities between Thomas’ â€Å"Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night† and Byron’s â€Å"On This Day I Complete My Thirty-sixth Year†. Just by reading the titles, one could tell that one similarity may be death and a difference would be how whoever goes into said inevitable event. A few of those differences and similarities that will be mentioned will be between the themes of each poem, the moods, and setup, among a couple ofRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night Essay1534 Words   |  7 Pages Do not go gentle into that good night: A look at man’s mortality By Robert Smith English 175-01 Lucas Brown Tuesday/Thursday 1:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. 10 November 2016 â€Æ' The vast majority of people today, though not always acknowledged, fear death and the great mystery of what comes next. Dylan Thomas’ poem â€Å"Do not go gentle into that good night† (1952) addresses this fear, only his point of view is from that of a loved one directed toward someone at deaths doorstep. The theme of â€Å"Do not go gentleRead MoreDo Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night893 Words   |  4 Pageschooses to do so, rhyme can also be used. Dylan Thomas was a poet most famous for his poem â€Å"Do not go gentle into that good night.† The poem is an example of a poetic form called villanelle which is a nineteen-line poem with at least two words that rhyme in each stanza. Thomas wrote this poem during the time of his father’s illness which was his way of encouraging his father to hang on and that life is too precious to give up on that quickly. As the theme of â€Å"Do not go gentle into that good night† is revealedRead More`` Do Not Go Ge ntle Into That Good Night ``1292 Words   |  6 Pageswrongness of it all. The persona in Dylan Thomas’ â€Å"Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night† does the same, ranting about how his father should â€Å"rage against the dying of the light† (428) throughout the poem, trying to convince him to fight against death. Thomas utilizes many metaphors in order to focus on the major theme of Death and how it brings out the vulnerabilities of those close to passing. The persona in â€Å"Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night† is that of a child, who is demanding that his father

Structure To Carry Out Business Operations â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Structure To Carry Out Business Operations? Answer: Introduction Just like sole proprietorship and incorporated business organizations, a partnership is a business structure used to carry out business operations. The meaning of partnership in Australia is the same across all states and territories in spite of different legislations governing it. Every definition provided by such legislation provides the same meaning in relation to the existence of a partnership. Firstly a partnership comes to an existence through a valid agreement between two or more partners. The agreement must satisfy all the essential elements of a contract. The agreement must be for the purpose of carrying on a business activity comprising of various business transaction. In case an agreement is formed between two or more parties to carry out a particular transaction it results in joint venture and not a partnership. The partnership provides mutual rights to all partners in the business as per the terms of the agreement. The partners are in accordance to the law of agency boun d to each other actions and each partner is regarded as an agent of the business. Therefore if one partner gets into a contract on behalf of the business the contract would be binding on all the partners of the business. A partnership has to be initiated for the purpose of making a profit. Non profit businesses like sporting clubs and charities are not considered as partnership and neither governed by the Partnership Act (Callison Sullivan, 2012). The commonwealth legislation which governs partnership in Australia is the Partnership Act 1963. In order to find out the position of mary, violet, sonny and rose it has to be firstly determined that whether a relationship of partnership exists between them on not. In case they are partners they would be liable to the third party for the actions of each other. Whether a partnership between the parties exists or not would be determined through the application of the elements of partnership in relation to the scenario. Existence of a partnership This section of the paper determines whether a relationship of partnership is present or not between Mary, Violet, Sonny and Rose through applying case laws and legislation to the facts of the case. As provided by Morse (2010) a partnership is a association among individuals indulging in business activities for the general purpose of making profit. It requires an agreement between two or more parties which is binding legally and contractual in nature. In the case of Green v Beesley (1835) 2 Bing N C 108 at 112 Tindal CJ defined partnerships as mutual participation however no legal entity is created by a partnership. In the case of Smith v Anderson (1880) 15 Ch D 247 at 273 it was provided by James LJ a partnership is a relationship between fixed person who are bound to each other with respect to an agreement which is carried out for a mutual objective, both in times of profit and loss. However a limited number of people are only allowed to form a partnership as provided by the Corpor ation Act 2001. The law of partnership is taken from both common law and statutory provisions. In the case of Lang v James Morrison Co Ltd (1911) 13 CLR 1 at 11 it was ruled by the court that partners while performing their duties in relation to the course of business acts as the agents of each other. The Partnership Act 1963 (PA) through section 6 provides the meaning of partnership. The section states that relationship between people having a common aim of profit making is a partnership which also includes an incorporated partnership. An external partnership is also included in the partnership as per section 6. Mary and Rose It has been provided by the scenario that Rose and Mary run a business known as the Busy Bee Florist Shop as partners. This means that they are bond to each others action which is committed during the course of business. There has been unseasonal weather and a drought which have resulted in losses for the business. They have also taken loan from friendly bank which is according to the provisions of partnership binding on each other. The profits and losses also have to shared by them equally as a contrary agreement has not been provided. Rose has approached one of her friends Violate to obtain a loan by providing her a share of profit. She has the authority to enter into contracts on behalf of the partnership therefore the contract is valid. Latter Mary had approached Sonny who is also the employee of the partnership for a lone in return of profit sharing in the business. After obtaining the loan both Mary and Rose go for a vacation even when the business was declining. They had also informed the bank from which they have taken loan that they have incorporated Sonny and Violet as partners. The question which has to be determined is that whether Violate and Sonny are the partners of the firm and thereby bond to the bank loan. The legal position of violet The agreement which Violet has entered upon with Rose in relation to providing the loan of $20000 to the business had the following terms. Firstly violet would have the right to share 20% profit and losses in relation to the business. Secondly violet would have the right to examine the books of account of the partnership. Thirdly, she would be entitled to be provided with a business statement quarterly. Finally, the money provided by her has to be considered by a mere loan and she is not to be considered as a partner of the business. The document of loan was executed before the money had been advanced by Violet. Section 7 of the PA provides provisions for the purpose of determining whether a relationship of partnership exists between the parties or not. 7(1) states that for the purpose of determining a relationship of partnership exists or not is based in the application of subsection 2-4 of this section. In the case of Canny Gabriel Castle Advertising Pty Ltd Anor v Volume Sales (Finance) Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 321 the defendants Volumes sales had indulged into an agreement to finance Fourth Media Management Pty Ltd. The agreement specified that the business was a joint venture and the money is provided only as a loan to the business. However the judges in this case ruled that the contract is an implied partnership and not a joint venture or a loan agreement. This was because the view of both the parties to the contract was to make profit. The profit which was made were to be shared equally. The parties were interested in financial well being of each other, thus this was a partnership and not a joint venture agreement. In the case of Re Ruddock (1879) 5 VLR (IP M) 51 the court ruled that even where the agreement stated that a person should not be considered as a partnership of the business they can be considered as partners in case it is evident they the requirements of partnership have been fulfilled. The right to participate in profit was held to be an authority of establishing partnership. The case provided that the relationship with respect to a partner is determined with respect to their rights in the business and not the wordings of the agreement. In the case of Wiltshire v Kuenzli (1945) 63 WN 47 Roper J stated that in order to determine the relationship of partnership not only the statutory rules but the whole circumstances surrounding the case has to be considered by the court. The court provided that if the parties to the partnership agreement agree to all things which show that they have indulged in a partnership, no contrary words can show that they do not have the intention to be bound to each other actions. In case the facts of the situation are ambiguous than the expressed intention of the parties stating that they do not want to be bound as partners has to be considered to determine partnership. However if there are clear facts which state that the relationship is a partnership the expressed intention by the parties to it is meaningless. As per the partnership act the receipt by a person to share profits is the main evidence to establish the relationship of partnership however mere contingency and profit variation in relation to the business done not establish a partnership relationship by itself. The principles have also been discussed in the case of Cox v Hickman (1880) 8 HL Cas 268 and Television Broadcasters Ltd v Ashtons Nominees Pty Ltd (No 1) (1979) 22 SASR 552. In the given circumstances it has been provided that violet not only wants to share profits but also wants additional control over the business. It has been expressly stated in the agreement that she does not want to be a partner of the business. However as per the above discussed case laws it has been analysed that even if the agreement states that a person does not want to be a partner he can be held as a partner upon the analysis of the other circumstances of the agreement. Therefore the fact that it has been provided by agreement between Violet and Rose that Violet is not a partner would not make her evade the liabilities of a partner. In addition the Violet is not only sharing profits in the business but by checking the books of accounts and with the right of quarterly business statements she has a significant involvement in the business. From such terms it can be determined that the she is also impliedly carrying on the business in common cause with Rose and Mary. Therefore giving relevance to the overall agreement she has with Rose she has to be regarded as a partner. Legal position of Sonny Section 7(4)(b) of the PA states that an agreement with an agent or employee of a person for remuneration through share of a profit does not make such person a partner of the business itself. Section 7(4)(d) further states that if a person lends money to the business and has a contract in writing with respect to which such person is entitled to get a interest rate changing with, or a sharing of profit from carrying out business does not become itself a partner of the business. In the given situation Sonny who is also the employee of the business has provided a loan of $10000 to the business in relation to a contract with Mary. The terms of the contract state that as a consideration of making the loan Sonny is entitled to receive a profit or loss of one-eight share of the firm. As discussed above as per the principles of the Ashton and Cox case mere sharing profit in the business does not make a person a partner. In addition the PA through the above discussed subsection 7(4)(b) and 7(4)(d) mere profit sharing does not make a person a partner of the business. In the case of Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Whiting (1943) 68 CLR 199 it was specifically provided by the court that advancing money in the form of loan by a person does not make him a partner of the firm itself. In the given situation as per the consideration of providing loan Sonny is only entitled to profit or loss and not other control over the business. Therefore through the application of the common law and statutory provisions it can be said that Sonny is not a partner of the firm. Conclusion It has been derived through the above discussion that Violet is a partner of the firm along with Rose and Mary, whereas Sonny is not. As per the provisions of partnership all partners are agents of each other and bound to each other actions. Here Rose and Mary have gone on a vacation and the business is still suffering losses. Even of this fact was not disclosed to Violate and even when the agreements provides that Violet is not a partner, she is liable to be bound to all actions of the business. Therefore she has the liability to repay the loan to Friendly bank along with Mary and Rose References Callison, J. W., Sullivan, M. A. (2012). Partnership Law and Practice: General and Limited Partnerships. West. Canny Gabriel Castle Advertising Pty Ltd Anor v Volume Sales (Finance) Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 321 Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) Cox v Hickman (1880) 8 HL Cas 268 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Whiting (1943) 68 CLR 199 Lang v James Morrison Co Ltd (1911) 13 CLR 1 at 11 Morse, G. (2010). Partnership law. Oxford University Press. Partnership Act 1963 (Cth) Television Broadcasters Ltd v Ashtons Nominees Pty Ltd (No 1) (1979) 22 SASR 552. Wiltshire v Kuenzli (1945) 63 WN 47